Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Weather
Complete Forecast
Search  Recent News  Archives  Web   for    
Opinion
  •  Columnists
  •  Editorials
  •  Editorial Cartoons
  •  Letters
Back to Home > 

Opinion





  email this    print this   
Posted on Fri, Apr. 09, 2004

WAL-MART

Low prices, but low wages, too




joyannreid@hotmail.com

On Tuesday, Wal-Mart lost a showdown with community leaders in Inglewood, Calif., where the company hoped to build a Supercenter in the working-class suburb of 112,000 mostly black and Hispanic residents. The mega-retailer is building Supercenters across America (including one just blocks from my house), selling everything from toys to groceries in complexes the size of a dozen football fields. In some cases, they're being welcomed. Other times, including in Chicago and San Diego recently, the 'Mart is getting the thumbs down.

Wal-Mart promised to bring 1,500 jobs to Inglewood. The mayor approved store's arrival, saying that complaints were mostly from unions that couldn't stand the competition. Opponents -- including the City Council, U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters, even the Southern Christian Leadership Conference -- said that the company pulled an end-run by going directly to the public for a vote and skirting the usual zoning and environmental regulations and public hearings.

Meager benefits

While the company lost that battle, it may yet win the war: America is in many ways becoming a Wal-Mart nation.

Americans love bargains, and Wal-Mart means low prices. But it also means low wages and meager benefits. Low wages are one reason Wal-Mart can undercut the competition. Cheap products manufactured overseas -- mostly in China -- are another. When Wal-Mart comes to town, it often crushes competitors -- from big, unionized retailers to local mom-and-pops -- and that can depress wages everywhere. The California grocery strike certainly had Wal-Mart written all over it.

Fairly or not, Wal-Mart has become a symbol for a larger phenomenon: a kind of downward migration of middle-class work -- or the fear of it -- that has huge implications in an election year.

Remember the rosy (though preliminary) Labor Department report saying that the United States added 308,000 jobs in March? The figure included 71,000 construction jobs, 47,000 in retail (including 13,000 striking California supermarket workers who went back to work), 42,000 professional and business service jobs (including 11,000 in credit mediation and mortgage refinancing), 39,000 in health and education, 28,000 in leisure and hospitality and 31,000 in government. New manufacturing jobs: zero.

Nation of part-timers

So, yes, jobs are slowly coming back, but the truth is that America is losing -- probably forever -- many higher-wage jobs, particularly in technology and manufacturing, that were a ''given'' in prior recoveries.

Increasingly, the ''old jobs'' are being replaced by another Wal-Mart staple: part-time work. According to the Labor Department, 4.7 million Americans worked part-time in March, up from 4.4 million the month before. That includes three million people who became part-timers due to ''slack work or business conditions'' plus 1.4 million who couldn't find any other work. (Another 19 million Americans work part-time for noneconomic reasons, i.e., to attend school or take care of a child.) From March 2003 to March 2004, the number of nonfarm workers who could find only part-time employment was up 17.8 percent.

With part-time work comes part-time wages. The hourly earnings in the private sector rose just 2 cents in March, while average weekly wages declined 88 cents to $523.70. This while corporate profits surged -- up a record 14.8 percent in 2003, including a 31.8 percent profit gain for manufacturers.

Where are corporations getting their profits? If you said sales, no prize for you. They're getting the profits from lower taxes, worker layoffs and by getting higher productivity out of the workers who remain. Since the recession ended in November 2001, wage growth has averaged just 0.6 percent per year. Meanwhile, last year CEOs raked in 16 percent higher salaries and 20 percent higher bonuses. A Northeastern University study found that in 2002-03, American workers got the lowest share of the nation's income growth of any economic recovery since World War II.

No middle-class jobs

America became a 20th century economic powerhouse by creating high wage, middle-class jobs that could support a family, often with just one adult working. In the 21st century, with global worker competition heating up and investors demanding ever-higher profits, wages seem to have nowhere to go but down.

That's probably good news for Wal-Mart, because it's the largest U.S. employer and the most affordable place to shop. But what's good for Wal-Mart isn't always good for America.

Joy-Ann Reid is an online news editor and freelance writer.


  email this    print this