Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Weather
Complete Forecast
Search  Recent News  Archives  Web   for    
Opinion
  •  Columnists
  •  Editorials
  •  Editorial Cartoons
  •  Letters
Back to Home > 

Opinion





  email this    print this   
Posted on Mon, Jan. 26, 2004

DEMOCRATS

20-somethings respond to Bush


joyannreid@hotmail.com

BY JOY-ANN REID

I admit I didn't watch the Democratic response to President Bush's State of the Union Message. Even a political junkie can take only so much.

But I did hear a rebuttal of Bush's remarks, courtesy of the 2020 Democrats, a group of 20-something activists whose co-founder I interviewed last August. At that time, the group had fielded about 400 ''vision'' statements from politicians and young voters on where Democrats hoped to see the party, and the country, headed by the year 2020. The group had received responses from just one congressman and a single presidential candidate: Howard Dean.

Fast forward to January 2004. According to a 2020 source, John Kerry and John Edwards have submitted ''visions,'' and Wesley Clark's position paper is on the way. The group's ranks have swelled to about 1,500 core members, mostly college students, and the group has bagged a conference call for members attending ''house parties'' across the country (and streamed online by the group Music for America) with comedian Al Franken.

Franken blasted Bush's laundry list of fresh spending, steroid references and marriage initiatives (''What happened to Mars?'' Franken demanded). He scoffed at Bush's roll-call of Iraq coalition members, which seemed comically reminiscent of Dean's histrionic rundown of states slated for the ``perfect storm.''

''We've got Denmark,'' said Franken. ``They've sent a medical team. Bulgaria and Slovakia are letting us use their airspace . . . Oh, and we've got Micronesia and Palau, which has no military.''

Fresh off his fourth USO tour, which took him to Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan (yes, we have troops there, too), Franken chided the administration for cutting veterans' benefits. He also took on Bush's WMD walk-back, saying, ``Last year, we heard about all those weapons of mass destruction we knew (Iraq) had, but now all we've got is `dozens of weapons of mass destructionrelated program activities.' Some of those activities, I understand, are coloring books.''

Like Bush, Franken acknowledged the changes in the country after the 2001 terror attacks, saying, ``After 9/11, this president had a united country and a united world. He had a chance to lead us in a spirit of mutual purpose, and he blew it.''

To Franken, the most ''Orwellian line'' of Bush's speech was: ''For diplomacy to be effective, our word must be credible. And now no one can doubt the word of America.'' His response: 'We lied about Iraq, and now we're losing the rest of the world . . . except El Salvador. They're giving us `political support.' ''

The 2020s listened attentively, and laughed at all the funny parts. When the Q&A came, a guy on the call asked, ``When Bush said children were being left behind by not being able to read in the third grade, do you think he was speaking from experience? Franken's response: ``I'll do the jokes.''

That call illustrated the new state of our political union. Technology has brought media, celebrities and ordinary people together in the strongest surge of collective, innovative political activity that I've seen. People across the country are shooting TV ads and streaming them over the Internet, setting up blogs and joining organizations -- such as 2020, Moveon.org, Hip Hop Team Vote and Americans Coming Together -- to affect the 2004 presidential election.

The question is whether old-school candidates can harness their impact in November.

Joy-Ann Reid is an online news editor and freelance writer.


  email this    print this